Headline Verdict: Both sources pass NIST STS; QSE shows slightly stronger margins across tests.
QSE Overall
PASS
Passed Tests: 6/6
System Overall
PASS
Passed Tests: 6/6
Wins by Test
4 QSE • 1 System
0 ties
Key Risk / Weakest Tests
| Source |
Weakest Test |
Pass Rate |
Uniformity p-value |
Threshold Margin |
| QSE |
Runs |
99/100 (99.00%) |
0.224821 |
3 |
| System |
BlockFrequency |
98/100 (98.00%) |
0.319084 |
2 |
Note: STS evaluates statistical randomness. It does not alone certify cryptographic strength or “quantum resilience.”
Per-Test Comparison (All Tests)
| Test |
QSE Pass Rate |
QSE p-value |
System Pass Rate |
System p-value |
Winner |
| BlockFrequency |
100/100 (100.00%) |
0.574903 |
98/100 (98.00%) |
0.319084 |
QSE |
| CumulativeSums |
100/100 (100.00%) |
0.595549 |
100/100 (100.00%) |
0.834308 |
System |
| Frequency |
100/100 (100.00%) |
0.383827 |
100/100 (100.00%) |
0.055361 |
QSE |
| LongestRun |
100/100 (100.00%) |
0.834308 |
99/100 (99.00%) |
0.574903 |
QSE |
| Runs |
99/100 (99.00%) |
0.224821 |
99/100 (99.00%) |
0.108791 |
QSE |
Recommended Next Steps
• Run multiple independent batches (e.g., 5 runs) with newly generated data for both sources.
• Increase sequences to 200–300 per run for stronger statistical confidence.
• Track stability: count how often any test hits minimum thresholds across runs.
• Archive all STS reports and parameters for auditability.